Tag Archives: travel

yellow bicycles

Urban Biking & Slow Travel: My New Favorite FI-Friendly Habit

A lot of people in the FIRE community are passionate about biking.  Some even go as far as replacing one (or both!) of their cars with a bicycle. While I admire that level of commitment, I’ll be honest: I’m not quite that gung-ho. Our slow-travel lifestyle isn’t exactly conducive to hauling a personal bike across the country, and I’m definitely not strapping one to a plane 🙂 

But here’s what has surprised me: using urban bike-share programs has become one of my favorite ways to explore a city. It’s the perfect “middle ground” for someone like me that is interested in the FI mindset, but also trying to live practically while bouncing from Honolulu to Kansas City to Omaha to Boston. This Fall alone, I’ve used bike shares in every one of those cities, and each experience has reinforced how useful (and fun!) they can be.

It expands your reach.
Walking a city is great, but it can limit your radius to a few miles. With bike share, suddenly the entire waterfront, the next neighborhood over, or that park you’ve been meaning to visit becomes accessible without giving up the pedestrian feel of truly experiencing a place. It’s slower and more immersive than driving, but infinitely faster than walking. A perfect sweet spot.  One thing I like to do is to grab a rental bike and go 4-5 miles in one direction to get a feel for an area, park the bike, then work my way back on foot.

It saves money.
Bike share programs are shockingly affordable. A few dollars unlocks a full day of mobility with no gas, no parking fees, no rideshares, etc.  In Omaha, for example, the Heartland month pass got me unlimited access to bikes throughout the metro area for around $20.  And while I’m not trying to replace a car with biking anytime soon, even occasional use can offset Uber rides or rental car time. For travel, especially slow travel, those savings add up.

It’s good for the environment.
One less car trip means fewer emissions. It’s a small thing, but choosing bikes over short car rides is exactly the kind of low-friction habit that makes the FI lifestyle more sustainable both financially and environmentally.

And honestly… riding a bike is just fun.
There’s something childlike and joyful about pedaling through a new part of the city. No agenda. No stress. Just moving your body, noticing small details, and feeling connected to the place you’re exploring.

As I continue this slow-travel journey, bike-share programs have quietly become one of my favorite tools. They let me explore more, spend less, and stay present in the spaces I’m temporarily calling home.

If you haven’t tried urban biking yet, especially while traveling I encourage you to give it a shot. Start with a short ride along a river, a downtown loop, or a neighborhood you’ve never visited. You might find, like I did, that it’s one of the simplest ways to make a city feel more accessible, more affordable, and a whole lot more fun.

CampFI: Four Ideas That Changed the Way We Think About Financial Independence

Earlier this month, Katie and I had the opportunity to present at CampFI Rocky Mountain (week 2.5) about our journey after reaching financial independence. We talked about our experiment with “slomadic” living, spending several months at a time in different parts of the country while trying to figure out what we want this next phase of life to look like.

Typically, people ask us about the logistics. How do we find housing? What do we do about mail? How do we handle healthcare, taxes, or travel rewards?  Those are interesting questions, but they aren’t really the biggest lessons we’ve learned. For this presentation we decided to focus on four themes that kept showing up over and over again throughout our journey. They have influenced almost every major decision we’ve made this year.

More Than One Right Answer

I love the Financial Independence movement, but the focus on optimization can lead to analysis paralysis.  Plus, as teachers, Katie and I are well aware of the multiple choice mentality that has conditioned many of us to believe that every question just has one correct answer.

Luckily, life doesn’t work that way. Should you pay off your house or invest? Retire early or keep working? Move across the country or stay close to family? The answer is often, “Yes :)”  

One of the most freeing ideas we’ve embraced is that decisions are rarely binary.  There are usually several good choices. We can be happy choosing A, B, OR C.  Once we accept that, decision-making becomes much easier.  We spend a lot less time trying to optimize every single variable and more time asking whether a choice fits the life that we are trying to build.

Freedom Is Better Than Wealth

This may be the biggest surprise of our FI journey. Looking back, many of our best financial decisions weren’t really about maximizing money. They were about maximizing options.

Katie left a higher-paying corporate career because education gave us work we enjoyed and schedules that fit our family. Later, side hustles, teaching online, and consulting gave us even more flexibility. Instead of making one giant leap into retirement, we gradually reduced the work we no longer enjoyed while keeping the parts that were still meaningful.  

The crazy thing?  In chasing freedom, the money followed naturally.  Financial independence didn’t simply increase our net worth. It increased our ability to say yes to opportunities (and our ability to say no). That has turned out to be far more valuable than just chasing dollars.

Simple Is Better Than Complex

If you’ve followed this blog for very long, you’ve probably noticed this theme already.

Simple investments. Simple travel. Simple spending. Simple housing.

I enjoy reading about complicated financial strategies just as much as the next FI nerd, but I’ve learned that complexity often creates more opportunities for mistakes. The same has been true in our personal lives. I can understand the appeal of real estate investment or the concept of RV travel, but the devil is in the details.  In both cases there are just too many variables and opportunities for friction for us right now.  We’ve realized we don’t need a large house, multiple properties, elaborate travel plans, or a complicated investment portfolio to be happy.

Simple systems free up mental energy for the things that actually matter.

Zero-Based Thinking

This has probably become our favorite mental model. Every once in a while, we like to ask ourselves a simple question:

“Knowing what we know today, would we make the same decision again?”

Sometimes the answer is yes, but sometimes it isn’t.

I really enjoyed teaching at the university, but after COVID permanently shifted the bulk of the teaching online, it no longer fit what I wanted to do. The four bedroom house by the elementary school and across the street from the community pool was perfect while raising kids, but isn’t the house two empty nesters need today.  The dependable sedan was great for commuting in city traffic, but not ideal for cross country moves.

Even our current experiment with slow travel is really just one long exercise in zero-based thinking. Instead of assuming we know where we want to spend retirement, we’re intentionally testing different possibilities before making another long-term commitment.

Looking Ahead

When we accepted CampFI’s invitation to speak, my first draft had us spending most of our time talking about geo-arbitrage, budgeting, and logistics.  Instead, we found ourselves talking about philosophy. How do you make decisions? How do you define success? What kind of life are you actually trying to build?

I hope the presentation was helpful for the people who attended, but I also hope these four ideas are useful for anyone pursuing financial independence, whether retirement is five years away or fifty.  After all, FI isn’t just about accumulating enough money to stop working. It’s about building a life that gives you the freedom to make the choices that matter most.

Are We Doing “Slow Travel” Wrong?

My amazing wife, Katie, and I have been having a bit of a debate lately.

It centers around the concept of “slow travel” and whether we’re actually doing it.

We used to spend a lot of our travel time rushing from place to place. Airports, rental cars, hotel check-ins, repeat. That phase of life had a goal. We wanted to get our boys to all 50 states before they graduated, and we (almost) did it. It was fast, chaotic, and a lot of fun.  Now we are in a different phase of life and things are different. At least, they’re supposed to be.

What Is Slow Travel?

Generally speaking, slow travel is an approach to travel that emphasizes extended stays, local experiences, and a more relaxed pace instead of rushing through a checklist of destinations. (In other words, the opposite of what we did when we were knocking out all 50 states during our Summer breaks 🙂) In our version, we stay in an area for 3-6 months and explore potential locations for our forever home.

From a financial independence perspective, slow travel also makes a lot of sense for us. It replaces short, expensive trips with longer, more sustainable stays and substitutes everyday living in a new location for traditional vacations. It also lets us take advantage of geographic arbitrage, using the local cost of living to control our expenses.  In this model, at some point, the line between travel and normal life starts to blur.

That part has been working great for us so far.

Where It Gets Complicated

But what happens when you’re living somewhere for three to six months… and you want to take a trip?  Maybe I want to go to a conference.  Or we want to take a quick road trip. Maybe there’s a place we want to see, but have no interest in living in.  Are we betraying our “slow travel” ideals?

Probably Not

The more we’ve talked about it, the more it feels like a debate about semantics.  After all, it would be a little silly to let a definition stop us from doing something we want to do, especially after working so hard to create optionality in our lives.

Slow travel works well for us as a general approach. It helps us slow down, spend less, and actually experience the places we visit.

But it’s not going to stop us from:
• Taking a quick sightseeing trip when we just want an overview
• Visiting a more expensive place for a few days instead of a few months
• Or making a one-time trip somewhere we simply want to see

The Bottom Line

“Slow travel” is a useful framework for us, not a law.  “More what you’d call ‘guidelines’ than actual rules” 😉  In the end, financial independence isn’t supposed to limit your choices, but to give you more of them.

Lessons From the First Year: Geography Does Not Automatically Change You

We just finished our first year of “slomadic” living, trying out different parts of the country and different styles of life with urban living in Omaha, Nebraska and beachside living in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. Along the way we learned a lot, but one of the biggest lessons has been surprisingly simple:

No matter where you go… there you are.

It is a cliche, but changing locations does not automatically create a different life or identity.

I think many people, especially those dreaming about retirement or relocation, just assume that a new environment will naturally transform them. Move near the beach and suddenly you become healthier, calmer, and outdoorsy. Move downtown and you become more social and cultured. Relocate to the mountains and somehow life becomes simpler and more peaceful.

Sometimes circumstances absolutely help. But our experience so far is that most of our internal habits traveled with us.I exercised about the same amount in Omaha as I did in Dallas. I was not magically better at meeting new people in South Carolina than I was in Nebraska. My personality, routines, and habits all packed themselves into the car and came with us 🙂

That realization has actually been helpful. Financially, this matters because ,in retirement, people often spend aggressively trying to solve problems that are not primarily financial:

  • burnout
  • dissatisfaction
  • loneliness
  • boredom
  • stress
  • unhealthy routines

A new house, a different city, or a dream retirement destination may improve your circumstances, but it does not automatically create personal transformation. That feels like an important counterbalance to some FIRE narratives. Financial independence creates capacity for change, but not automatic change itself.

FU money can remove constraints. It can buy flexibility, autonomy, and time. It can allow you to leave situations that are making you miserable. Those are incredibly valuable things. But money alone cannot independently create:

  • meaning
  • structure
  • relationships
  • discipline
  • purpose
  • community

Those things still require intentional effort, regardless of location.

In some ways, slow travel has actually highlighted this lesson more clearly for us because each move acts like a little reset button. You quickly discover which parts of your life were truly tied to location and circumstance and which parts were really tied to you. For me, one of the biggest lessons from year one has been realizing that while geography can support growth, it cannot substitute for it.

The encouraging side of that realization is that happiness may be more portable than we sometimes think. If you already enjoy simple routines, movement, exploration, reading, or spending time with people you care about, those things can travel with you almost anywhere.

The challenging side is that unresolved issues tend to travel too 🙂  

Lessons From the First Year: Geography Does Not Automatically Change You

We just finished our first year of “slomadic” living, trying out different parts of the country and different styles of life with urban living in Omaha, Nebraska and beachside living in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. Along the way we learned a lot, but one of the biggest lessons has been surprisingly simple:

No matter where you go… there you are.

It is a cliche, but changing locations does not automatically create a different life or identity.

I think many people, especially those dreaming about retirement or relocation, just assume that a new environment will naturally transform them. Move near the beach and suddenly you become healthier, calmer, and outdoorsy. Move downtown and you become more social and cultured. Relocate to the mountains and somehow life becomes simpler and more peaceful.

Sometimes circumstances absolutely help. But our experience so far is that most of our internal habits traveled with us.I exercised about the same amount in Omaha as I did in Dallas. I was not magically better at meeting new people in South Carolina than I was in Nebraska. My personality, routines, and habits all packed themselves into the car and came with us 🙂

That realization has actually been helpful. Financially, this matters because ,in retirement, people often spend aggressively trying to solve problems that are not primarily financial:

  • burnout
  • dissatisfaction
  • loneliness
  • boredom
  • stress
  • unhealthy routines

A new house, a different city, or a dream retirement destination may improve your circumstances, but it does not automatically create personal transformation. That feels like an important counterbalance to some FIRE narratives. Financial independence creates capacity for change, but not automatic change itself.

FU money can remove constraints. It can buy flexibility, autonomy, and time. It can allow you to leave situations that are making you miserable. Those are incredibly valuable things. But money alone cannot independently create:

  • meaning
  • structure
  • relationships
  • discipline
  • purpose
  • community

Those things still require intentional effort, regardless of location.

In some ways, slow travel has actually highlighted this lesson more clearly for us because each move acts like a little reset button. You quickly discover which parts of your life were truly tied to location and circumstance and which parts were really tied to you. For me, one of the biggest lessons from year one has been realizing that while geography can support growth, it cannot substitute for it.

The encouraging side of that realization is that happiness may be more portable than we sometimes think. If you already enjoy simple routines, movement, exploration, reading, or spending time with people you care about, those things can travel with you almost anywhere.

The challenging side is that unresolved issues tend to travel too 🙂  

Lessons From the First Year: Every Major Life Upgrade Has Hidden Tradeoffs

We just finished our first year of “slomadic” living, trying out different parts of the country and different styles of life with urban living in a small big city in Omaha, Nebraska and beachside living in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. One of the lessons we have learned is the importance of looking at both sides of every major life change.

It is very easy to focus on what we are gaining.  Everything from an oceanfront view and easy beach access to walkability and access to cultural activities. Those benefits are real, and they matter. But one of the biggest lessons from this year is that the more important question is often not just “What am I gaining?” but also “What am I giving up?”

People often evaluate life changes by focusing almost entirely on the positives:

  • better weather
  • Tax advantages
  • nicer scenery
  • slower pace of life
  • more free time
  • lower housing costs

But lifestyle decisions are rarely one-dimensional optimization problems. Every move introduces tradeoffs.  Even positive changes can come with losses:

  • distance from relationships
  • disruption of routines
  • social isolation
  • healthcare disruptions
  • reduced community connection
  • loss of identity tied to previous work or location

Some of those costs are financial. Many are emotional or social, which makes them much harder to measure and quantify.

That is one reason I think retirement and FI discussions sometimes become overly simplistic. Spreadsheets are great at modeling taxes, housing costs, investment returns, and withdrawal rates, but they struggle to capture things like loneliness, boredom, lack of purpose, or the stabilizing value of community and routine.

We have been trying to evaluate decisions more holistically during this process. Instead of asking only:
“Is this cheaper?” or  “Is this more beautiful?” We are also asking:  “How does daily life actually feel here?” and “What parts of our current life would we miss?”

For example, beach living in Myrtle Beach has been wonderful in many ways. We loved the scenery, the ability to walk on the beach regularly, and the slower pace. But it also came with tradeoffs:

  • smaller living space (and no real kitchen)
  • distance from family and long-term friends
  • a more transient social environment
  • Not walkable to stores and restaurants
  • tourist crowds at certain times of year

Similarly, urban living in Omaha gave us walkability, interesting neighborhoods, and a surprisingly vibrant downtown lifestyle, but it also came with weather realities and distance from many of the places and people we know best.

None of those tradeoffs automatically make a decision bad. They just make it more complicated than a simple “upgrade.”

I think this is especially important for early retirees and location-independent workers because freedom creates the ability to move frequently, but movement itself also has costs. Stability, routine, and community provided more emotional value (especially for Katie) than we realized while we still had them. One of the biggest lessons from our first year is that there may not be a perfect place or perfect lifestyle. There are simply different bundles of tradeoffs.

The goal is not to eliminate tradeoffs entirely, but to choose the ones that fit us best.  And to keep in mind that there is no one correct answer, but many choices that may be right for us 🙂 

Lessons From the First Year: Lifestyle Inflation Has a Hedonic Ceiling

We just finished our first year of “slomadic” living, trying out different parts of the country and different styles of life with urban living in Omaha, Nebraska and beachside living in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. One of the lessons we have learned has been to be careful about making long-term decisions based on things that feel amazing in the short term but quickly become routine.

The ChooseFI community talks a lot about “hedonic adaptation” as one of the biggest hidden obstacles to financial independence. The basic idea is that people quickly adjust to improvements in lifestyle, income, possessions, or comfort. What initially feels luxurious slowly becomes normal, and the emotional boost fades much faster than the bill.

That idea connects directly to lifestyle inflation. As income rises, spending tends to quietly rise along with it. Bigger houses, newer cars, nicer hotels, upgraded neighborhoods, subscriptions, dining out, and premium experiences all start to feel justified because they are now “affordable.” The danger is that expenses expand just as fast as earnings, delaying financial independence indefinitely.

For most of our journey toward FI, Katie and I worked hard to avoid that trap. We tried to frame spending decisions around buying freedom instead of accumulating “stuff.” We were never particularly interested in keeping up with the Joneses, and we scratched our itch for luxury experiences without permanently inflating our lifestyle was through travel hacking using points and miles rather than higher spending.

It gets tougher in a nomadic life, though.  Instead of making one decision to buy a cheer house and then benefiting for years, every relocation gives us another opportunity to overspend.  So our challenge keeps resetting itself every time we move.

When you arrive somewhere new, it is very easy to convince yourself that certain upgrades are absolutely worth it. A slightly nicer neighborhood. A better beach view. A more walkable location. A premium gym. Better weather. More restaurants nearby. And honestly, some of those things really do improve quality of life.

The problem is that emotional adaptation happens quickly.

The ocean view that feels magical the first week may become the thing you barely notice while washing dishes. The rooftop lounge becomes background scenery. The upgraded apartment starts to feel normal instead of special. Financially, that matters because recurring lifestyle costs persist while emotional returns decay.

That does not mean upgrades are bad. Some improvements absolutely create durable satisfaction. Better health, lower stress, walkability, proximity to friends, and environments that align with your values can all be worth paying for. The key lesson for us has simply been to become more intentional about distinguishing between upgrades that create lasting value and upgrades that mainly create temporary excitement.

I think this becomes especially important in retirement and FI planning because permanent fixed expenses compound risk over time. Things like second homes, timeshares, boats, RVs, luxury neighborhoods, and high-maintenance lifestyles may sound exciting initially, but they also create ongoing financial obligations long after the novelty wears off.

Ironically, one of the things we are learning is that flexibility often produces more happiness than permanent escalation.

Temporary access to desirable experiences can outperform ownership both financially and psychologically. Spending a few months living near the beach may deliver much of the same joy as owning beachfront property, but without the taxes, insurance, maintenance, and long-term commitment. Visiting interesting places, rather than permanently upgrading every aspect of life, may actually preserve more appreciation and excitement over time.

At least for me, that has been one of the biggest lessons from year one. Sometimes the sweet spot is not maximizing luxury. It is creating enough flexibility that life continues to feel interesting before adaptation quietly turns everything back into normal

Lessons From the First Year: The Value of Temporary Living

We just finished our first year of “slomadic” living, trying out different parts of the country and different styles of life. So far that has included urban living in Omaha, Nebraska and beachside living in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. Along the way, we have learned a lot, but one of the biggest lessons is that there are real advantages to medium-term stays and temporary living arrangements.

One of the big benefits of snowbirding, slow travel, sabbaticals, or extended rentals is that they allow you to test a future life before committing your capital to it. That may sound obvious, but I think many people underestimate how different a place can feel when you are actually living there instead of simply visiting.

That is the real financial insight for me: experience can be more valuable than ownership.

At first glance, renting for a few months may seem financially inefficient compared to buying. After all, you are paying rent without building equity. Because we still own our home in Texas, you could certainly argue that paying for temporary housing in another location at the same time is not the most optimized use of our money.

And mathematically, that is fair.

But when I compare a few months of rent to the potential cost of making a major relocation mistake, the equation changes pretty quickly. 

  • Buying in the wrong area
  • overestimating how often you will use a second property
  • Purchasing a “money pit” timeshare, RV, or boat that you won;t use enough
  • Misjudging the climate or pace of life
  • Locking yourself into a lifestyle you only liked in theory or in the short term

All of these can become enormously expensive lessons. In comparison, a few months of rent feels like cheap insurance 🙂

One thing we have learned repeatedly is that visiting a place and living in a place are completely different experiences. Vacations tend to highlight scenery, attractions, restaurants, and novelty. Daily life highlights grocery stores, traffic patterns, workout options, healthcare access, weather, and whether the rhythms of the place actually fit your personality. Those ordinary Tuesday factors matter a lot more than most people realize.

I think this idea is especially powerful for people pursuing financial independence or retirement. Many people spend years optimizing for a future life they have never actually tested. They dream about living in an RV, sailing around the world, relocating to the mountains, moving to a beach town, or settling into downtown urban life, but then commit large amounts of money before figuring out whether they truly enjoy the reality of those lifestyles.

Short-term trials create clarity. They reduce the odds of making expensive permanent decisions based on fantasy instead of experience. That may be one of the biggest lessons from our first year. Sometimes flexibility is more valuable than optimization, especially while we are still figuring out what kind of life we actually want to build.

Smaller is Better Continued (State Parks)

We recently spent a day at Huntington Beach State Park, and it reminded us of something we don’t think gets talked about enough. We have always loved national parks, and if a place earns that designation it is almost always worth visiting. But on this trip, we were reminded that state parks often offer many of the same benefits with fewer crowds, lower costs, and a more relaxed experience.

First Impressions

Huntington Beach sat just south of Myrtle Beach and felt like a completely different world almost as soon as we entered. There were no long lines or chaotic parking lots, just a simple gate and a modest entrance fee. It cost $8 per person to get in, which immediately felt like a bargain compared to most attractions in the area.

Variety in a Small Space

What stood out was how much variety the park packed into a relatively small space. In one visit, we walked along a wide, uncrowded beach, explored marsh boardwalks, and hiked through maritime forest. The transitions between these environments happened quickly, which made the experience feel dynamic without requiring multiple days of planning or driving.

Wildlife Highlights

The wildlife ended up being one of the biggest highlights. Huntington Beach is known for birding, but the most memorable encounters for us were the alligators. We saw dozens in the freshwater ponds and marsh areas, sometimes just off the trail. (We also learned that crouching down for pictures is not recommended.) Being that close to wildlife was both fascinating and a little humbling. Along the way we also saw herons, egrets, pelicans, and more turtles than we could count. By the end of the visit, it felt less like a park and more like a living ecosystem that we got to step into for the day.

Atalaya Castle

One of the more unexpected features of the park was Atalaya Castle. Built in the 1930s by Archer and Anna Hyatt Huntington, this Moorish-style winter home sat right in the middle of the preserve. For an additional $2 per person, we explored the grounds and walked through its open courtyards and rooms. It was not a polished, highly curated experience, but for us that was part of the appeal. It added a layer of history that complemented the natural surroundings and made the visit feel more complete.

State Parks vs National Parks

This trip helped clarify something we have been thinking about for a while. National parks tend to offer larger, more iconic landscapes along with more infrastructure and more crowds. State parks, on the other hand, are usually smaller, less expensive, and easier to navigate. They also tend to feel more accessible and less rushed. Another advantage became obvious as we traveled more. There are far more state parks than national parks, and in places like South Carolina, where Congaree is the only national park nearby, they provide more frequent opportunities to get outside and explore.

The Financial Angle

From a financial independence perspective, the value was hard to beat. Ten dollars per person covered entry and the castle and gave us a full day of beach, trails, wildlife, and history. We packed a picnic, so there were no expensive add-ons or pressure to spend more once we were there. The simplicity of the experience kept the cost low.

The Bigger Lesson

This fits a pattern we have been seeing throughout our travels. Smaller zoo experiences often felt more enjoyable than the biggest ones. Eating earlier often provided the same experience at a lower cost. Local recreation options often replaced more expensive memberships. Now we could add state parks to that list. We will continue to visit national parks because they offer something unique and memorable, but places like Huntington Beach reminded us that we did not always need the biggest or most famous destination to have a meaningful experience. Sometimes a quiet trail, a view of the water, some wildlife (and a healthy respect for alligators 🙂  is more than enough.

Your Turn

Have you found places where the simpler option turned out to be just as good or even better than the big-name destination?

Five Nights, Five Marriotts

Typically when we’re on the road, we stay at low- to mid-range chain hotels. We used to go for the absolute cheapest option. After all, we’re really only there to clean up and sleep before heading to the next destination.  But this is one area where we’ve relaxed a bit. Years of business travel taught me that trying to save a few dollars on a no-name hotel can make the next day miserable if you don’t sleep well. The consistency of a known brand also makes life on the road a lot easier.

On this road trip, I decided to challenge my habits and run a bit of an experiment. Instead of sticking with our usual go-to, we switched it up when possible. It didn’t hurt that Marriott was running a promo where I earned bonus points and elite night credits for each different brand. That meant this cross-country trip turned into five Marriott brands in five consecutive nights.

Same loyalty program. Very different experiences.

AC Hotel – Asheville, NC ($129)

I picked this one for the location and because it’s not a brand I stay at often. AC Hotels lean into a modern, European-inspired aesthetic. Clean design (Katie called it “minimalist”), smaller but efficient rooms, and a focus on shared spaces instead of oversized rooms.

I had some work to do, and the “AC Library” gave me a great space outside the room. We got a $10-per-person welcome credit, which we turned into locally made cookies and popcorn. They also waived the usual $22 parking fee.

A few minor negatives: I’m not a fan of sliding barn doors on bathrooms, and Katie didn’t love the sofa. But the balcony, rain shower, and long bench for suitcase living were all big positives.

Funny story: we scheduled a late checkout so I could return and work after dropping Katie at the Biltmore. When I came back, the overzealous housekeeping crew had already stripped the beds and started cleaning the room. The front desk apologized, gave me some bonus points, and set me up in a media room normally reserved for meetings. It ended up being a better workspace than the room would have been so… win/win 🙂 

Fairfield Inn & Suites – Cherokee, NC ($122)

I’ve stayed at this brand… a lot. Fairfield is one of Marriott’s more affordable options, focused on simplicity and consistency. Clean rooms, free breakfast, and not much else.  It was also the only Marriott option near the park entrance, so it won by default.

The room was clean, and the breakfast was actually better than expected. Eggs that weren’t rubbery, a good selection of Greek yogurt, and real oatmeal with toppings. Not amazing, but solid.

The Wayback (Tribute Portfolio) – Pigeon Forge, TN ($98)

This one caught my attention online. Retro roadside motel vibe, bright colors, lots of social spaces. I was a little skeptical, but it turned out to be a fun property that fit the Pigeon Forge atmosphere perfectly. I don’t love exterior doors, but ours opened into a courtyard overlooking a pool, hot tub, and even an Airstream bar instead of out onto the main road.

The breakfast (a welcome gift) was made-to-order instead of a buffet, which was a nice surprise. A couple of minor issues with the bathroom door and a double charge that was quickly fixed, but overall a fun and unique stay.

SpringHill Suites – Bowling Green, KY ($193)

When traveling with the kids, we used to prioritize all-suite properties like SpringHill. Extra space, separate living areas, and free breakfast made a big difference.

The extra space is not as important when it is just the two of us, especially for a one night stay, but I chose this location because it was only a little more expensive than a brand with smaller rooms and it was located a little more conveniently to our next stop, the Mammoth Cave National Park.

The extra room was nice, but the property wasn’t the cleanest we’ve stayed in. The staff was friendly and responsive, though, and the bar came in handy for grabbing limes for the rest of the trip 🙂

Courtyard – Little Rock, AR ($146)

Courtyard is probably the Marriott brand I’ve stayed at the most when traveling for work. It’s designed for business travelers and sits right in the middle between budget and full-service. It typically features comfortable rooms, flexible workspaces, and an on-site bistro for made-to-order food and drinks instead of a traditional free breakfast.  That all works for me because I don’t typically eat breakfast on work trips, but I do sometimes need the business center options.  And, at the risk of sounding like a grumpy old man… because of their target demographics, at Courtyards it is rare to have kids running around, screaming, or dripping all over the elevator on their way out of the pool like you sometimes see in family focused hotels.

We chose this one for a calm final night on the road.  This property is located downtown, but is super convenient to the highway so we knew that we could duck in, get a nice clean room in a probably quiet hotel, and hit the road again in the morning.  No muss, no fuss. 

Bonus points for the fitness center, which was larger than usual since it’s shared with other businesses. After a long day of driving and exploring Mammoth Cave, I needed it.

Final Totals

Here’s how the numbers shook out:

  • AC Hotel: $129
  • Fairfield: $122
  • Wayback: $98
  • SpringHill Suites: $193
  • Courtyard: $146

Total: $688 for five nights
Average: ~$138 per night

That’s a little below our $150/night target for this kind of travel.  At each hotel I received welcome gifts ranging from water  bottles and free parking, to $20 credits, to free breakfast.  We also earned roughly 25,000 Marriott points, which is about enough for a free night at a similar-level property.  Because of the promo, I also earned a lot of elite night credits which will help achieve Titanium level (and yet another free night certificate).

On top of that, I paid with my Chase Sapphire Reserve at 4x points, earning about 2,750 Chase points (4x on $688). That’s not life-changing, but those points are transferable and generally considered to be much more valuable than the Marriott points.  it layers on another small layer of value, enough to contribute toward a future flight or hotel stay.

The Bigger Takeaway

Spending five nights across five different brands was a great reminder of how wide the range is within a single hotel chain. Each property served a different purpose, and none of them were “better” in a vacuum. They were just better or worse depending on what we needed that night.

Some nights called for space.  Some called for convenience.  Some called for price.

That’s one of the real advantages of sticking with a larger brand like Marriott. It’s not about always picking the nicest option. It’s about picking the right option for the situation.

Sometimes, the best trip isn’t about consistency. It’s about variety.